aluminium: be good in cooking equipment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.55
, material
Weight: 0.54
, ingredient
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, product
Weight: 0.49
Siblings raw material
Weight: 0.28
, aluminum
Weight: 0.28
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.28
, copper
Weight: 0.28
, gold
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good in cooking equipment 1.00
be used in cooking equipment 0.98
be used for cooking pots 0.85
be used in non-stick frying pans 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(aluminium, be used in cooking equipment)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be used in cooking equipment)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be used for cooking pots)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(aluminium, be used for cooking pots)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be used for cooking pots)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(aluminium, be used in cooking equipment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(aluminium, be used for cooking pots)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(aluminium, be used in non-stick frying pans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be used in non-stick frying pans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be used in non-stick frying pans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(aluminium, be used in non-stick frying pans)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be used in cooking equipment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(aluminium, be good in cooking equipment)