aluminum foil: help pain from burn

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plastic
Weight: 0.72
, material
Weight: 0.71
, metal
Weight: 0.69
, foil
Weight: 0.59
Siblings aluminum
Weight: 0.39
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.38
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.37
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
help pain from burn 1.00
burn in microwave 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(foil, burn in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, help pain from burn)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(aluminum foil, help pain from burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(foil, burn in microwave)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, help pain from burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(foil, burn in microwave)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(foil, burn in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(aluminum foil, help pain from burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, help pain from burn)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(aluminum foil, help pain from burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, help pain from burn)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(aluminum foil, help pain from burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, burn in microwave)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(aluminum foil, help pain from burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, burn in microwave)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(aluminum foil, help pain from burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, burn in microwave)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(aluminum foil, help pain from burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, burn in microwave)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(aluminum foil, help pain from burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, help pain from burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, help pain from burn)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(aluminum foil, help pain from burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, help pain from burn)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, help pain from burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(foil, burn in microwave)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(aluminum foil, help pain from burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(foil, burn in microwave)