aluminum foil: is dull

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plastic
Weight: 0.72
, material
Weight: 0.71
, metal
Weight: 0.69
, foil
Weight: 0.59
Siblings aluminum
Weight: 0.39
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.38
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.37
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dull 1.00
have dull 0.99
have dull side 0.94
be dull on one side 0.92
have dull sides 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(foil, have dull side)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is dull)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(foil, have dull side)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(foil, have dull side)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(foil, have dull side)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is dull)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, is dull)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, have dull side)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be dull on one side)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, have dull side)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, have dull side)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, have dull sides)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, have dull side)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, be dull on one side)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be dull on one side)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, have dull sides)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, have dull sides)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, have dull sides)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be dull on one side)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is dull)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is dull)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(foil, have dull side)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(aluminum foil, is dull)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(foil, have dull side)