aluminum: be good for recycling

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.78
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, chemical
Weight: 0.64
Siblings aluminum chloride
Weight: 0.66
, titanium
Weight: 0.64
, hafnium
Weight: 0.43
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.39
, steel
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for recycling 1.00
is recycled 0.82
be recycled 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(steel, be recycled)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(steel, be recycled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(steel, be recycled)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(aluminum, be good for recycling)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(aluminum, is recycled)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(aluminum, be recycled)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(aluminum, is recycled)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be recycled)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(aluminum, is recycled)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(aluminum, be recycled)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be recycled)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is recycled)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good for recycling)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good for recycling)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good for recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(steel, be recycled)