aluminum: be recycle

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, chemical
Weight: 0.64
, mineral
Weight: 0.61
Siblings titanium
Weight: 0.64
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.39
, steel
Weight: 0.38
, copper
Weight: 0.37
, magnesium
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be recycle 1.00
be recyclable 0.85
be valuable as recyclable 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(steel, be recycle)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(steel, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(steel, be recycle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(aluminum, be recycle)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be valuable as recyclable)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be recyclable)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(aluminum, be recyclable)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(aluminum, be valuable as recyclable)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be recyclable)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(aluminum, be recyclable)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be valuable as recyclable)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(aluminum, be valuable as recyclable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be recycle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(aluminum, be recycle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be recycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(steel, be recycle)