amazon: have issues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bookstore
Weight: 0.67
, web site
Weight: 0.65
, web page
Weight: 0.65
, vendor
Weight: 0.62
, giant
Weight: 0.62
Siblings aol
Weight: 0.35
, wikipedia
Weight: 0.35
, google
Weight: 0.35
, web browser
Weight: 0.35
, ebay
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have issues 1.00
handle legal issues 0.87
have problems 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(aol, have problems)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(aol, have problems)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(aol, have problems)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(amazon, have issues)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amazon, handle legal issues)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(amazon, have problems)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(amazon, handle legal issues)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(amazon, have problems)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(amazon, handle legal issues)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(amazon, handle legal issues)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(amazon, have problems)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(amazon, have problems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(amazon, have issues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(amazon, have issues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(amazon, have issues)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(aol, have problems)