amendment: was repealed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.73
, revision
Weight: 0.69
, provision
Weight: 0.68
, clause
Weight: 0.65
, rule
Weight: 0.64
Siblings plan
Weight: 0.69
, bill
Weight: 0.40
, legislation
Weight: 0.39
, measure
Weight: 0.37
, resolution
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was repealed 1.00
is is repealed 0.99
is repealed 0.99
be repealed 0.99
is enacted 0.85
be enacted into law 0.85
be enforced in law 0.79
be enacted in parliament 0.79
be enacted in british parliament 0.78
is unconstitutional 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(rule, be enforced in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(amendment, was repealed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(rule, be enforced in law)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(rule, be enforced in law)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(bill, be enacted in british parliament)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(legislation, is enacted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(rule, be enforced in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(amendment, was repealed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(legislation, is enacted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(legislation, is enacted)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(bill, be enacted in british parliament) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(bill, be enacted in british parliament)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(amendment, was repealed)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(amendment, be repealed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(amendment, is repealed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(amendment, is is repealed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(amendment, be repealed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(amendment, be repealed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(amendment, is repealed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(amendment, is repealed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(amendment, is repealed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(amendment, be repealed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(amendment, is is repealed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(amendment, is is repealed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(amendment, is is repealed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(amendment, is unconstitutional)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(amendment, is unconstitutional)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(amendment, is unconstitutional)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(amendment, is unconstitutional)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amendment, was repealed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(amendment, was repealed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(rule, be enforced in law)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(legislation, is enacted)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bill, be enacted in british parliament)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(amendment, was repealed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(rule, be enforced in law)