amide: is para directing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents functional group
Weight: 0.66
, group
Weight: 0.60
, linkage
Weight: 0.59
, substance
Weight: 0.55
Siblings amino acid
Weight: 0.36
, amine
Weight: 0.35
, sodium hydroxide
Weight: 0.35
, ammonium sulfate
Weight: 0.34
, methyl
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is para directing 1.00
is ortho para directing 0.91
is ortho para director 0.81
is ortho para meta 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(amide, is para directing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(methyl, is ortho para director)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(amide, is para directing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(methyl, is ortho para director) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(methyl, is ortho para director)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(amide, is para directing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(amide, is para directing)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(amide, is para directing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(amide, is ortho para directing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(amide, is para directing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(amide, is ortho para directing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(amide, is para directing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(amide, is ortho para directing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(amide, is para directing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(amide, is ortho para meta)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(amide, is para directing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(amide, is ortho para directing)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(amide, is para directing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(amide, is para directing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(amide, is para directing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(amide, is para directing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(amide, is para directing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(amide, is para directing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(methyl, is ortho para director)