amine: be better nucleophiles than alcohols

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents functional group
Weight: 0.63
, amino acid
Weight: 0.60
, substance
Weight: 0.58
, derivative
Weight: 0.58
Siblings ammonia
Weight: 0.65
, ammonium hydroxide
Weight: 0.65
, pyridine
Weight: 0.63
, histamine
Weight: 0.61
, aniline
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better nucleophiles than alcohols 1.00
be more nucleophilic than alcohols 0.95
be more reactive than alcohols 0.95
be more basic than alcohols 0.95
be more soluble than alcohols 0.94
be less acidic than alcohols 0.94
be more polar than alcohols 0.93
be stronger bases than alcohols 0.91
be less acidic than alcohol 0.79
be weaker than amines 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(aniline, be weaker than amines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(aniline, be weaker than amines)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(aniline, be weaker than amines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(amine, be more nucleophilic than alcohols)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(amine, be more polar than alcohols)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(amine, be more polar than alcohols)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(amine, be more nucleophilic than alcohols)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(amine, be more nucleophilic than alcohols)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(amine, be more polar than alcohols)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(amine, be more polar than alcohols)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(amine, be more nucleophilic than alcohols)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(amine, be more soluble than alcohols)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(amine, be stronger bases than alcohols)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(amine, be more basic than alcohols)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(amine, be stronger bases than alcohols)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(amine, be more basic than alcohols)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(amine, be more basic than alcohols)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(amine, be more reactive than alcohols)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(amine, be more basic than alcohols)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(amine, be stronger bases than alcohols)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(amine, be less acidic than alcohols)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(amine, be more reactive than alcohols)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(amine, be more reactive than alcohols)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(amine, be less acidic than alcohols)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(amine, be stronger bases than alcohols)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(amine, be less acidic than alcohols)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(amine, be more reactive than alcohols)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(amine, be more soluble than alcohols)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(amine, be less acidic than alcohols)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(amine, be less acidic than alcohol)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(amine, be less acidic than alcohol)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(amine, be more soluble than alcohols)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(amine, be less acidic than alcohol)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(amine, be less acidic than alcohol)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(amine, be more soluble than alcohols)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(amine, be better nucleophiles than alcohols)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(aniline, be weaker than amines)