amine: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents functional group
Weight: 0.63
, amino acid
Weight: 0.60
, substance
Weight: 0.58
, derivative
Weight: 0.58
Siblings ammonia
Weight: 0.65
, ammonium hydroxide
Weight: 0.65
, pyridine
Weight: 0.63
, histamine
Weight: 0.61
, aniline
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is good nucleophile 0.87
is good nucleophiles 0.87
taste good 0.79
be bad for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ammonia, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(histamine, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ammonia, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ammonia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(ammonia, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(histamine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(histamine, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(ammonia, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ammonia, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(amine, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(amine, is good nucleophile)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(amine, is good nucleophile)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(amine, is good nucleophiles)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(amine, is good nucleophiles)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(amine, is good nucleophile)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(amine, is good nucleophiles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(amine, is good nucleophile)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(amine, is good nucleophiles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(amine, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(amine, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ammonia, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(histamine, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(amine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(ammonia, be bad for environment)