ammunition: be in short supply

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents necessity
Weight: 0.57
, cargo
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.53
, gear
Weight: 0.52
, commodity
Weight: 0.51
Siblings cartridge
Weight: 0.58
, firearm
Weight: 0.32
, hand grenade
Weight: 0.32
, grenade
Weight: 0.31
, canned goods
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in short supply 1.00
be in supply 0.93
have demand 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(necessity, have demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(ammunition, be in short supply)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(ammunition, be in short supply) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(necessity, have demand)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(ammunition, be in short supply) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(necessity, have demand)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(necessity, have demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(ammunition, be in short supply) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(ammunition, be in short supply)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(ammunition, be in short supply) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(ammunition, be in short supply)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(ammunition, be in short supply) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ammunition, be in supply)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(ammunition, be in short supply) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(ammunition, be in supply)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(ammunition, be in short supply) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ammunition, be in supply)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(ammunition, be in short supply) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ammunition, be in supply)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(ammunition, be in short supply) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(ammunition, be in short supply) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(ammunition, be in short supply)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(ammunition, be in short supply) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(ammunition, be in short supply)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(ammunition, be in short supply) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(necessity, have demand)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(ammunition, be in short supply) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(necessity, have demand)