amphibian: is unsuccessful land vertebrates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tree frog
Weight: 0.77
, newt
Weight: 0.66
, turtle
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unsuccessful land vertebrates 1.00
is land vertebrates 0.91
be vertebrates 0.87
is vertebrates 0.87
be different from vertebrates 0.87
be different from other vertebrates 0.85
be classified as vertebrates 0.84
be different from other classes of vertebrates 0.80
be different from other other classes of vertebrates 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(amphibian, is land vertebrates)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(amphibian, is land vertebrates)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(amphibian, is land vertebrates)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(amphibian, is vertebrates)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(amphibian, is vertebrates)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(amphibian, be vertebrates)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(amphibian, be vertebrates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(amphibian, is vertebrates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(amphibian, be vertebrates)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(amphibian, be different from other classes of vertebrates)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(amphibian, be different from other classes of vertebrates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(amphibian, be different from other classes of vertebrates)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be different from other classes of vertebrates)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, is land vertebrates)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be vertebrates)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, is vertebrates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(amphibian, is unsuccessful land vertebrates)