amplitude: be related to loudness

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.65
, parameter
Weight: 0.63
, intensity
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.51
, property
Weight: 0.51
Siblings variation
Weight: 0.58
, frequency
Weight: 0.36
, jitter
Weight: 0.35
, density
Weight: 0.34
, viscosity
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to loudness 1.00
affect loudness 0.98
affect loudness of sound 0.96
affect loudness of vibration 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(intensity, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(amplitude, be related to loudness)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(intensity, be related to loudness)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(intensity, be related to loudness)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(intensity, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(amplitude, be related to loudness)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(amplitude, be related to loudness)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(amplitude, affect loudness)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(amplitude, affect loudness)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(amplitude, affect loudness of sound)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(amplitude, affect loudness)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(amplitude, affect loudness of sound)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(amplitude, affect loudness of sound)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(amplitude, affect loudness of vibration)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(amplitude, affect loudness of vibration)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, affect loudness of sound)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, affect loudness)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(amplitude, affect loudness of vibration)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, affect loudness of vibration)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, be related to loudness)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(amplitude, be related to loudness)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(intensity, be related to loudness)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(amplitude, be related to loudness)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(intensity, be related to loudness)