amplitude: be related to waves energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.65
, parameter
Weight: 0.63
, intensity
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.51
, property
Weight: 0.51
Siblings variation
Weight: 0.58
, frequency
Weight: 0.36
, jitter
Weight: 0.35
, density
Weight: 0.34
, viscosity
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to waves energy 1.00
affect waves 0.89
affect light waves 0.88
be related to energy 0.86
affect wave 0.82
affect speed of wave 0.81
affect wave frequency 0.81
has shape wave 0.80
be measured on wave 0.80
affect compressional wave 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be related to energy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(frequency, be related to energy)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(frequency, be related to energy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(amplitude, be related to waves energy)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(amplitude, affect waves)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(amplitude, affect waves)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(amplitude, affect waves)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(amplitude, affect light waves)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(amplitude, affect light waves)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(amplitude, be related to energy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(amplitude, affect light waves)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(amplitude, be related to energy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(amplitude, affect wave)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(amplitude, affect wave)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(amplitude, be related to energy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(amplitude, affect wave frequency)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(amplitude, affect wave)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(amplitude, affect speed of wave)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(amplitude, affect speed of wave)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(amplitude, affect wave frequency)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(amplitude, has shape wave)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(amplitude, be measured on wave)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(amplitude, has shape wave)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(amplitude, affect wave frequency)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(amplitude, affect compressional wave)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(amplitude, be measured on wave)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(amplitude, affect speed of wave)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(amplitude, affect compressional wave)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(amplitude, has shape wave)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(amplitude, be measured on wave)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(amplitude, affect compressional wave)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, affect light waves)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, be related to energy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, affect waves)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, affect compressional wave)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, be measured on wave)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, affect speed of wave)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, has shape wave)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, affect wave)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, affect wave frequency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, be related to waves energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(amplitude, be related to waves energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, be related to waves energy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(frequency, be related to energy)