amputation: be hard on heart

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.69
, complication
Weight: 0.67
, condition
Weight: 0.65
, operation
Weight: 0.60
, method
Weight: 0.59
Siblings plastic surgery
Weight: 0.37
, mastectomy
Weight: 0.37
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.36
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.36
, surgery
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard on heart 1.00
is hard 0.83
be hard on body 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(method, is hard)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(amputation, be hard on heart)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(method, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(method, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(surgery, be hard on body)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(surgery, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(method, is hard)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(amputation, be hard on heart)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(surgery, be hard on body)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(surgery, be hard on body)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(surgery, is hard)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(surgery, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(amputation, be hard on heart)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(amputation, be hard on heart)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(amputation, be hard on heart)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(method, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(surgery, be hard on body)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(surgery, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(amputation, be hard on heart)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(method, is hard)