amsterdam: has physical part canals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents london
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.58
, los angeles
Weight: 0.58
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.35
, quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, switzerland
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part canals 1.00
have many canals 0.94
be full of canals 0.93
be built on canals 0.93
change water in canals 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(venice, be built on canals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(venice, has physical part canals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(venice, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(venice, has physical part canals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(venice, be built on canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(venice, be built on canals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(amsterdam, has physical part canals)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, be built on canals)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(amsterdam, be built on canals)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, be built on canals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, be full of canals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(amsterdam, be full of canals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, be full of canals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(amsterdam, be built on canals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, change water in canals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(amsterdam, change water in canals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, have many canals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(amsterdam, have many canals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(amsterdam, be full of canals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, have many canals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, change water in canals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(amsterdam, have many canals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(amsterdam, change water in canals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, has physical part canals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(amsterdam, has physical part canals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(venice, has physical part canals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, has physical part canals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(venice, be built on canals)