amsterdam: is nice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents london
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.58
, los angeles
Weight: 0.58
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.35
, quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, switzerland
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is nice 1.00
was good 0.81
looks like like 1600 0.77
is cool 0.76
was good place 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(city, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(amsterdam, is nice)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(city, is cool)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(city, is cool)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is cool)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(city, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, is nice)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(mexico city, is cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is cool)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(amsterdam, is nice)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(amsterdam, looks like like 1600)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(amsterdam, looks like like 1600)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(amsterdam, is cool)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was good place)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, looks like like 1600)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was good place)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(amsterdam, is cool)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, is cool)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was good place)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, looks like like 1600)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is cool)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good place)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is nice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(amsterdam, is nice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, is cool)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mexico city, is cool)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(amsterdam, is nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, is cool)