amsterdam: was good location for city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents london
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.58
, los angeles
Weight: 0.58
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.35
, quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, switzerland
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good location for city 1.00
is city 0.84
was good place 0.80
is green city 0.77
is smart city 0.77
was good 0.76
was place 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was good location for city)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(london, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was good location for city)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(los angeles, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was good location for city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(london, is city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(city, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is city)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(london, is city)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(city, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(venice, is city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(london, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(los angeles, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mexico city, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(venice, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(venice, is city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was good location for city)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(amsterdam, is city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, is city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(amsterdam, is city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(amsterdam, is green city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, is green city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(amsterdam, is smart city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, is smart city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was place)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(amsterdam, is green city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is green city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(amsterdam, is smart city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is smart city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was good place)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was place)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was good place)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was place)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was good place)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good place)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was place)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was good location for city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(london, is city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(los angeles, is city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mexico city, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(venice, is city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(london, is city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(los angeles, is city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, was good location for city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)