amsterdam: was renamed york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents london
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.58
, los angeles
Weight: 0.58
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.35
, quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, switzerland
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was renamed york 1.00
was renamed new york 0.99
was remamed new york 0.85
was remamed york 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was renamed york)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was renamed new york)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was renamed new york)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was renamed new york)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was renamed new york)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was remamed new york)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was remamed new york)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was remamed new york)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was remamed york)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was remamed york)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was remamed york)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was remamed new york)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was remamed york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was renamed york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(amsterdam, was renamed york)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was renamed york)