amsterdam: was strong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents london
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.58
, los angeles
Weight: 0.58
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.35
, quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, switzerland
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was strong 1.00
was good 0.84
was strong colony 0.78
was good place 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was strong)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was strong colony)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was strong colony)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was strong colony)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was strong colony)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was good place)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was good place)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was good place)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was good place)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was strong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(amsterdam, was strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was strong)