analysis: be different from calculus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.59
, journal
Weight: 0.59
, projection
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.76
, report
Weight: 0.67
, review
Weight: 0.60
, insight
Weight: 0.59
, reporting
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from calculus 1.00
be important in math 0.78
be related in math 0.78
be important in geography 0.76
is geography 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(factor, be important in math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(analysis, be different from calculus)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(factor, be related in math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(analysis, be different from calculus)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(projection, is geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(analysis, be different from calculus)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(projection, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(analysis, be different from calculus)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(projection, be important in geography)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(factor, be related in math)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(projection, is geography)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related in math)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in math)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(projection, be important in geography)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(projection, is geography)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(factor, be important in math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(analysis, be different from calculus)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(factor, be related in math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(analysis, be different from calculus)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(projection, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(analysis, be different from calculus)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(projection, is geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(analysis, be different from calculus)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(analysis, be different from calculus)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be different from calculus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(analysis, be different from calculus)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(projection, is geography)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(projection, be important in geography)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(factor, be related in math)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, be important in math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(projection, is geography)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(projection, be important in geography)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(factor, be related in math)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(analysis, be different from calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, be important in math)