analyst: draw sets of dfds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expert
Weight: 0.76
, third party
Weight: 0.55
, employee
Weight: 0.55
, researcher
Weight: 0.54
Siblings economist
Weight: 0.37
, scientist
Weight: 0.36
, professor
Weight: 0.36
, scholar
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
draw sets 1.00
draw sets of dfds 1.00
draw multiple sets 0.94
draw multiple sets of dfds 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(analyst, draw sets of dfds)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(analyst, draw sets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(analyst, draw sets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(analyst, draw sets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(analyst, draw multiple sets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(analyst, draw multiple sets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(analyst, draw multiple sets of dfds)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(analyst, draw multiple sets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(analyst, draw multiple sets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(analyst, draw multiple sets of dfds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(analyst, draw sets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(analyst, draw multiple sets of dfds)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(analyst, draw multiple sets of dfds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(analyst, draw sets of dfds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(analyst, draw sets of dfds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(analyst, draw sets of dfds)