analyst: study whether geography

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expert
Weight: 0.76
, employee
Weight: 0.55
, researcher
Weight: 0.54
, people
Weight: 0.53
Siblings economist
Weight: 0.37
, scientist
Weight: 0.36
, professor
Weight: 0.36
, scholar
Weight: 0.35
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
study whether geography 1.00
study subject 0.78
study subject in experiment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(researcher, study subject in experiment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(analyst, study whether geography)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(analyst, study whether geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(researcher, study subject in experiment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(analyst, study whether geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(researcher, study subject in experiment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(analyst, study whether geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(professor, study subject)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(researcher, study subject in experiment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(analyst, study whether geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(analyst, study whether geography)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(analyst, study whether geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(professor, study subject) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(professor, study subject)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(analyst, study whether geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(analyst, study whether geography)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(analyst, study whether geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(analyst, study whether geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(analyst, study whether geography)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(analyst, study whether geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(analyst, study whether geography)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(analyst, study whether geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(researcher, study subject in experiment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(analyst, study whether geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(professor, study subject)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(analyst, study whether geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(researcher, study subject in experiment)