analyst: use ebitda

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expert
Weight: 0.76
, third party
Weight: 0.55
, employee
Weight: 0.55
, researcher
Weight: 0.54
Siblings economist
Weight: 0.37
, scientist
Weight: 0.36
, professor
Weight: 0.36
, scholar
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
use ebitda 1.00
look at ebitda 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(analyst, use ebitda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(analyst, use ebitda)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(analyst, use ebitda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(analyst, look at ebitda)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(analyst, use ebitda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(analyst, look at ebitda)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(analyst, use ebitda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(analyst, look at ebitda)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(analyst, use ebitda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(analyst, look at ebitda)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(analyst, use ebitda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(analyst, use ebitda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(analyst, use ebitda)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(analyst, use ebitda) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(analyst, use ebitda)