android: be stronger in past

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents linux
Weight: 0.67
, cell phone
Weight: 0.64
, smartphone
Weight: 0.64
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.63
, software
Weight: 0.63
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.36
, samsung
Weight: 0.35
, nokia
Weight: 0.35
, ipad
Weight: 0.35
, motorola
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stronger in past 1.00
be stronger than frieza 0.91
have less emojis 0.77
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(linux, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(android, be stronger in past)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(linux, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(linux, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(iphone, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(linux, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(android, be stronger in past)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(iphone, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(iphone, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(android, be stronger in past)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(android, be stronger than frieza)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(android, be stronger than frieza)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(android, be stronger than frieza)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(android, be stronger than frieza)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(android, have less emojis)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(android, have less emojis)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(android, have less emojis)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(android, have less emojis)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(android, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(android, has quality better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(android, has quality better)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(android, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(android, be stronger in past)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(android, be stronger in past)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(linux, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(iphone, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(android, be stronger in past)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(linux, has quality better)