anemone: be at cluster of rock

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.66
, flower
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.59
, animal
Weight: 0.57
, bulb
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, jellyfish
Weight: 0.36
, starfish
Weight: 0.36
, giant squid
Weight: 0.36
, aster
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cluster of rock 1.00
be at rock 0.84
be at rock wall 0.79
sun on rock 0.78
be at field under rock 0.77
sun themselves on rock 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at rock)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at rock wall)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at field under rock)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lizard, sun on rock)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lizard, be at rock wall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at rock wall)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(lizard, be at rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at rock)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lizard, sun on rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lizard, sun on rock)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(lizard, be at field under rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at field under rock)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(anemone, be at cluster of rock)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(anemone, be at cluster of rock)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(anemone, be at cluster of rock)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lizard, be at rock)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lizard, be at rock wall)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lizard, sun on rock)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(anemone, be at cluster of rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lizard, be at field under rock)