anesthesia: become competitive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.62
, treatment
Weight: 0.61
, service
Weight: 0.58
, medication
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings plastic surgery
Weight: 0.36
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.35
, anesthetic
Weight: 0.35
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.35
, sedative
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
become competitive 1.00
become less competitive 0.96
is competitive 0.95
become popular 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, become competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is competitive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, become competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, become popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(anesthesia, become competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plastic surgery, is competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is competitive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(anesthesia, become competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(plastic surgery, become popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, become popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(anesthesia, become competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(anesthesia, become competitive)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(anesthesia, become competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, become less competitive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(anesthesia, become competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(anesthesia, become less competitive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(anesthesia, become competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(anesthesia, become less competitive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(anesthesia, become competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(anesthesia, become less competitive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(anesthesia, become competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(anesthesia, become competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, become competitive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(anesthesia, become competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(anesthesia, become competitive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, become competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is competitive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, become competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, become popular)