angelfish: has physical part fins

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.57
, boy
Weight: 0.33
, tank
Weight: 0.30
Siblings rainbow trout
Weight: 0.36
, seahorse
Weight: 0.36
, guppy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part fins 1.00
have long fins 0.94
have ventral fins 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part fins)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(seahorse, has physical part fins)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(angelfish, has physical part fins)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(angelfish, have long fins)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(angelfish, have ventral fins)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(angelfish, have ventral fins)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(angelfish, have ventral fins)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(angelfish, have ventral fins)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(angelfish, have long fins)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(angelfish, have long fins)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(angelfish, have long fins)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(angelfish, has physical part fins)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(angelfish, has physical part fins)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(angelfish, has physical part fins)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(seahorse, has physical part fins)