angle: be like acute angles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.65
, distance
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.62
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
Siblings degree
Weight: 0.61
, vertical
Weight: 0.55
, glare
Weight: 0.47
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.39
, flexion
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like acute angles 1.00
be like angles 0.89
be different from angles 0.88
be used in angles 0.88
be used for angles 0.87
be different from straight angles 0.84
is acute 0.83
be parallel to angle 0.78
be parallel to angle of reflection 0.77
be equal to angle 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(degree, be used in angles)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(degree, be used for angles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(degree, be used in angles)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(degree, be used in angles)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(degree, be used for angles)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(degree, be used for angles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(angle, be like acute angles)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(angle, be different from straight angles)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(angle, is acute)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(angle, be different from straight angles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(angle, is acute)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(angle, be different from straight angles)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(angle, be parallel to angle of reflection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(angle, be parallel to angle of reflection)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(angle, be parallel to angle of reflection)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(angle, is acute)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(angle, be different from straight angles)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(angle, is acute)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(angle, be parallel to angle of reflection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(angle, be like acute angles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(angle, be like acute angles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(degree, be used in angles)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(angle, be like acute angles)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(degree, be used for angles)