animal fat: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.65
, material
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, fat
Weight: 0.62
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.35
, dog poop
Weight: 0.35
, sodium bicarbonate
Weight: 0.35
, meat
Weight: 0.35
, sodium sulfate
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal fat, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fat, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dog food, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(animal fat, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(dog poop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(dog poop, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(dog food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(dog food, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(animal fat, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(animal fat, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal fat, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fat, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(dog food, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dog poop, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fat, has quality bad)