animal: be a part of ecosystem

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, asset
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75
, badger
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of ecosystem 1.00
be a part of ecology 0.79
be at ecology 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(animal, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(animal, be a part of ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(animal, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(animal, be a part of ecology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(animal, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(animal, be at ecology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(animal, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(animal, be a part of ecology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(animal, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(animal, be at ecology)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(animal, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(animal, be a part of ecology)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(animal, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at ecology)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(animal, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(animal, be at ecology)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(animal, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(animal, be a part of ecology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(animal, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(animal, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(animal, be a part of ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(animal, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(animal, be a part of ecosystem)