animal: be big or small

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, asset
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75
, badger
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
be big or small 1.00
be born small and then get big 0.85
has big tooth 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(animal, be big or small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cougar, has big tooth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be big or small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cougar, has big tooth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cougar, has big tooth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be big or small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(animal, be big or small)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(animal, be big or small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(animal, be big or small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(animal, be big or small)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be big or small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(animal, be big or small)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(animal, be big or small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cougar, has big tooth)