animal: be called blue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, living thing
Weight: 0.62
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called blue 1.00
has color blue 0.90
has color red 0.82
has color orange 0.81
has color yellow 0.81
be brown in color 0.81
has color white 0.80
is colored 0.80
turn white 0.79
see white 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(creature, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be called blue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(victim, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be called blue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(victim, has color red)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(creature, has color yellow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(creature, has color yellow)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(victim, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, has color yellow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(victim, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be called blue)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(creature, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be called blue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(prairie dog, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, has color yellow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, be called blue)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, has color white)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has color white)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has color white)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has color white)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, see white)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, see white)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, see white)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, see white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be called blue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be called blue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(victim, has color red)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(creature, has color yellow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(prairie dog, has color yellow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(victim, has color red)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be called blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(creature, has color yellow)