animal: be covered with fur

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, living thing
Weight: 0.62
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
be covered with fur 1.00
be covered in fur 0.99
be covered with thick fur 0.96
completely covered in fur 0.94
be with fur 0.92
be with white fur 0.91
have fur 0.91
have white fur 0.91
be with thick fur 0.90
wear fur 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be covered with fur)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mammal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mammal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(llama, have fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be covered with fur)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(llama, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(llama, have fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, be covered with fur)

Similarity expansion

0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, be covered in fur)
0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be covered in fur)
0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be covered in fur)
0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be covered in fur)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, have fur)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, have fur)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have fur)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, have fur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be covered with fur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be covered with fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(llama, have fur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be covered with fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)