animal: be mammal

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, asset
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75
, badger
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
be mammal 1.00
be extinct if all member of it specie be dead 0.75
be carnivore omnivore or vegetarian 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(creature, be extinct if all member of it specie be dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(animal, be mammal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(animal, be mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(creature, be extinct if all member of it specie be dead)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(animal, be mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(creature, be extinct if all member of it specie be dead)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(creature, be extinct if all member of it specie be dead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(animal, be mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(animal, be mammal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(animal, be mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(animal, be mammal)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(animal, be mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(animal, be carnivore omnivore or vegetarian)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(animal, be mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(animal, be carnivore omnivore or vegetarian)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(animal, be mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(animal, be carnivore omnivore or vegetarian)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(animal, be mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(animal, be carnivore omnivore or vegetarian)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(animal, be mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(animal, be mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(animal, be mammal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(animal, be mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(animal, be mammal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(animal, be mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(creature, be extinct if all member of it specie be dead)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(animal, be mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(creature, be extinct if all member of it specie be dead)