animal: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, living thing
Weight: 0.62
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
has physical part tail 0.89
has physical part legs 0.85
has physical part claws 0.83
has physical part heads 0.83
has physical part whiskers 0.82
has physical part wings 0.82
has physical part teeth 0.82
has physical part necks 0.82
has physical part hair 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(llama, has physical part teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(llama, has physical part teeth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part hair)