animal: sense danger

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, asset
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75
, badger
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
sense danger 1.00
sense fear 0.87
sense fear in human 0.85
sense your presence 0.77
sense their environment 0.77
has strong sense 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(animal, sense danger)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(animal, sense fear)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(animal, sense fear in human)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(animal, sense fear)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(animal, sense fear in human)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(animal, sense their environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(animal, sense their environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(animal, sense fear)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(animal, sense fear in human)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(animal, sense fear)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(animal, sense their environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(animal, sense fear in human)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(animal, sense their environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(animal, sense danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(animal, sense danger)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(animal, sense danger)