animation: be treated differently in america

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.61
, medium
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, design
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shrek
Weight: 0.62
, photography
Weight: 0.33
, cinema
Weight: 0.33
, editing
Weight: 0.33
, comic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be treated differently in america 1.00
be better than american 0.81
be in louisiana benefit others 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(industry, be in louisiana benefit others)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(animation, be treated differently in america)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animation, be treated differently in america)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(industry, be in louisiana benefit others)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(animation, be treated differently in america)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(industry, be in louisiana benefit others)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(industry, be in louisiana benefit others)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(animation, be treated differently in america)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animation, be treated differently in america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animation, be treated differently in america)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(animation, be treated differently in america)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(animation, be treated differently in america)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(animation, be better than american)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(animation, be treated differently in america)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(animation, be better than american)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animation, be treated differently in america)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(animation, be better than american)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(animation, be treated differently in america)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(animation, be better than american)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(animation, be treated differently in america)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(animation, be treated differently in america)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(animation, be treated differently in america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animation, be treated differently in america)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(animation, be treated differently in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(animation, be treated differently in america)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(industry, be in louisiana benefit others)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(animation, be treated differently in america)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(industry, be in louisiana benefit others)