anode: rotate in x ray tube

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cathode
Weight: 0.72
, electrode
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.54
Siblings aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.36
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.35
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.35
, germanium
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum hydroxide
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
rotate in x ray tube 1.00
is x ray 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(electrode, is x ray)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cathode, is x ray)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(anode, rotate in x ray tube)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cathode, is x ray)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(electrode, is x ray)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(electrode, is x ray)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cathode, is x ray)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(electrode, is x ray)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cathode, is x ray)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(anode, rotate in x ray tube)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(anode, rotate in x ray tube)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(anode, rotate in x ray tube)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(anode, rotate in x ray tube)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(cathode, is x ray)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(electrode, is x ray)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(cathode, is x ray)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(anode, rotate in x ray tube)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(electrode, is x ray)