answer: be rubbish com

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents question
Weight: 0.66
, way
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.63
, picture
Weight: 0.62
Siblings explanation
Weight: 0.69
, silence
Weight: 0.59
, excuse
Weight: 0.57
, verdict
Weight: 0.52
, interjection
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rubbish com 1.00
is com crap 0.89
is rubbish 0.88
dot com suck 0.80
dot com 0.80
is trash 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(answer, be rubbish com)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(answer, is com crap)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(answer, is rubbish)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(answer, dot com suck)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(answer, is trash)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(answer, is com crap)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(answer, is com crap)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(answer, is rubbish)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(answer, is com crap)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(answer, is rubbish)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(answer, is rubbish)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(answer, dot com suck)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(answer, dot com suck)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(answer, dot com suck)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(answer, is trash)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(answer, is trash)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(answer, is trash)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(answer, be rubbish com)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(answer, be rubbish com) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(answer, be rubbish com)