answer: be through kinetic particle theory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents question
Weight: 0.66
, way
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.63
, picture
Weight: 0.62
Siblings explanation
Weight: 0.69
, silence
Weight: 0.59
, excuse
Weight: 0.57
, verdict
Weight: 0.52
, interjection
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be through kinetic particle theory 1.00
be through particle theory 0.95
be described as nonlinear 0.76
be atom 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(method, be described as nonlinear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(answer, be through kinetic particle theory)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(answer, be through kinetic particle theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(method, be described as nonlinear)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(answer, be through kinetic particle theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(method, be described as nonlinear)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(method, be described as nonlinear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(answer, be through kinetic particle theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(answer, be through kinetic particle theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(answer, be through kinetic particle theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(answer, be through kinetic particle theory)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(answer, be through kinetic particle theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(answer, be through particle theory)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(answer, be through kinetic particle theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(answer, be through particle theory)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(answer, be through kinetic particle theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(answer, be through particle theory)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(answer, be through kinetic particle theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(answer, be through particle theory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(answer, be through kinetic particle theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(answer, be through kinetic particle theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(answer, be through kinetic particle theory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(answer, be through kinetic particle theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(answer, be through kinetic particle theory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(answer, be through kinetic particle theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(method, be described as nonlinear)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(answer, be through kinetic particle theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(method, be described as nonlinear)