answer: do want job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents question
Weight: 0.66
, way
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.63
, picture
Weight: 0.62
Siblings explanation
Weight: 0.69
, silence
Weight: 0.59
, excuse
Weight: 0.57
, verdict
Weight: 0.52
, interjection
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
do want job 1.00
do want work 0.93
be to everything 42 0.76
be better than family guy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(way, be better than family guy)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(answer, do want job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(answer, do want job)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(way, be better than family guy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(answer, do want job)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(way, be better than family guy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(way, be better than family guy)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(answer, do want job)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(answer, do want job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(answer, do want job)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(answer, do want job)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(answer, do want job)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(answer, be to everything 42)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(answer, do want job)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(answer, be to everything 42)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(answer, do want job)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(answer, be to everything 42)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(answer, do want job)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(answer, be to everything 42)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(answer, do want job)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(answer, do want job)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(answer, do want job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(answer, do want job)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(answer, do want job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(answer, do want job)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(way, be better than family guy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(answer, do want job)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(way, be better than family guy)