antagonist: come up with villainous names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents molecule
Weight: 0.62
, compound
Weight: 0.62
, ligand
Weight: 0.62
, agent
Weight: 0.61
, composition
Weight: 0.54
Siblings agonist
Weight: 0.35
, rna molecule
Weight: 0.34
, protease inhibitor
Weight: 0.34
, adenosine triphosphate
Weight: 0.34
, peptide
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
come up with villainous names 1.00
come up with names 0.79
is character 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(antagonist, come up with villainous names)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(antagonist, come up with villainous names)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(antagonist, come up with villainous names)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(antagonist, is character)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(antagonist, come up with villainous names)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(antagonist, come up with names)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(antagonist, come up with villainous names)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(antagonist, come up with names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(antagonist, come up with villainous names)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(antagonist, come up with names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(antagonist, come up with villainous names)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(antagonist, is character)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(antagonist, come up with villainous names)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(antagonist, come up with names)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(antagonist, come up with villainous names)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(antagonist, is character)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(antagonist, come up with villainous names)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(antagonist, is character)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(antagonist, come up with villainous names)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(antagonist, come up with villainous names)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(antagonist, come up with villainous names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(antagonist, come up with villainous names)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(antagonist, come up with villainous names)