antelope: be endangered in desert

Related concepts

Parents	wild animal Weight: 0.65 , animal Weight: 0.55 , wildlife Weight: 0.55 , mammal Weight: 0.54 , prey Weight: 0.47
Siblings	gazelle Weight: 0.58 , elk Weight: 0.38 , deer Weight: 0.38 , rhino Weight: 0.37 , zebra Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be endangered in desert	1.00
is endangered	0.86
is canyon red	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(wildlife, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(antelope, be endangered in desert)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(wildlife, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(elk, is endangered)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(rhino, is endangered)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(zebra, is endangered)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(deer, is endangered)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(gazelle, is endangered)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(wildlife, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(antelope, be endangered in desert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(gazelle, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(gazelle, is endangered)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(deer, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(deer, is endangered)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(rhino, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(rhino, is endangered)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(zebra, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(zebra, is endangered)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(elk, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(elk, is endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(antelope, be endangered in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(antelope, is endangered)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(antelope, is endangered)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(antelope, is endangered)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(antelope, is canyon red)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(antelope, is canyon red)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(antelope, is canyon red)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(antelope, is endangered)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(antelope, is canyon red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(antelope, be endangered in desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(wildlife, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(gazelle, is endangered)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(rhino, is endangered)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(elk, is endangered)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(zebra, is endangered)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(deer, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(antelope, be endangered in desert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(wildlife, is endangered)