anticipation: has state technique

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents emotion
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.51
, question
Weight: 0.50
, contract
Weight: 0.47
Siblings excitement
Weight: 0.33
, anxiety
Weight: 0.33
, frustration
Weight: 0.32
, preparation
Weight: 0.32
, joy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state technique 1.00
is useful technique 0.91
is persuasive technique 0.86
is useful persuasive technique 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(anticipation, has state technique)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(anticipation, is useful technique)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(anticipation, is persuasive technique)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(anticipation, is persuasive technique)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(anticipation, is useful persuasive technique)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(anticipation, is useful technique)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(anticipation, is useful persuasive technique)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(anticipation, is persuasive technique)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(anticipation, is useful persuasive technique)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(anticipation, is useful technique)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(anticipation, is persuasive technique)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(anticipation, is useful persuasive technique)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(anticipation, is useful technique)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(anticipation, has state technique)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(anticipation, has state technique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(anticipation, has state technique)