antifreeze: affect dog

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.59
, substance
Weight: 0.59
, poison
Weight: 0.57
, liquid
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings liquid water
Weight: 0.35
, ethylene glycol
Weight: 0.35
, sulfuric acid
Weight: 0.35
, liquid nitrogen
Weight: 0.35
, acetic acid
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect dog 1.00
be bad for dogs 0.87
be dangerous to cats 0.80
be dangerous to pets 0.79
be toxic to dogs 0.79
be harmful to pets 0.79
be poisonous to cats 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(antifreeze, affect dog)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(ethylene glycol, be harmful to pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(antifreeze, affect dog)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(ethylene glycol, be harmful to pets)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(ethylene glycol, be harmful to pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(antifreeze, affect dog)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(antifreeze, affect dog)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(antifreeze, affect dog)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(antifreeze, be dangerous to cats)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(antifreeze, affect dog)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(antifreeze, be dangerous to cats)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(antifreeze, affect dog)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(antifreeze, be dangerous to cats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(antifreeze, affect dog)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(antifreeze, be bad for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(antifreeze, affect dog)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(antifreeze, be poisonous to cats)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(antifreeze, affect dog)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(antifreeze, affect dog)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(antifreeze, affect dog)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(antifreeze, affect dog)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(antifreeze, affect dog)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(antifreeze, affect dog)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ethylene glycol, be harmful to pets)