apartheid: was practiced in africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.60
, injustice
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, system
Weight: 0.55
, atrocity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings segregation
Weight: 0.34
, racism
Weight: 0.34
, slavery
Weight: 0.33
, genocide
Weight: 0.33
, occupation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was practiced in africa 1.00
was practiced in south africa 0.97
was used in africa 0.87
was in africa 0.86
was started in africa 0.85
was used in south africa 0.84
was started in south africa 0.83
be in africa 0.83
was defined in africa 0.83
was created in africa 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(slavery, be in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(slavery, was in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(slavery, was in africa)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(slavery, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(slavery, be in africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(apartheid, was practiced in africa)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(apartheid, was practiced in south africa)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(apartheid, was practiced in south africa)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in south africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(apartheid, was used in africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(apartheid, was started in africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(apartheid, was started in africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was started in africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(apartheid, was in africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(apartheid, be in africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(apartheid, was created in africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(apartheid, was used in africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(apartheid, was created in africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(apartheid, be in africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(apartheid, was started in south africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(apartheid, was started in south africa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(apartheid, was in africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(apartheid, was practiced in south africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was started in south africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was created in africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(apartheid, was used in south africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(apartheid, was used in africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, be in africa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(apartheid, was in africa)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(apartheid, was used in south africa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(apartheid, was started in africa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(apartheid, was used in south africa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was in africa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was used in africa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(apartheid, was defined in africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(apartheid, be in africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(apartheid, was defined in africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(apartheid, was created in africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was used in south africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(apartheid, was started in south africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(apartheid, was defined in africa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was defined in africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(apartheid, was practiced in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(slavery, was in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was practiced in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(slavery, be in africa)