apartment: be in new york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents house
Weight: 0.63
, space
Weight: 0.63
, bedroom
Weight: 0.63
Siblings hotel room
Weight: 0.68
, ground floor
Weight: 0.65
, townhouse
Weight: 0.54
, duplex
Weight: 0.50
, high rise
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in new york 1.00
be expensive in new york 0.96
be in nyc 0.80
is nyc 0.79
be expensive in miami 0.75
be in boston 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, be in boston)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hotel room, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(hotel room, be in boston)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(apartment, be in new york)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in new york)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(apartment, be expensive in new york)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(apartment, be expensive in new york)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(apartment, be expensive in new york)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(apartment, be in boston)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(apartment, be in boston)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(apartment, be expensive in miami)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in miami)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be in boston)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(apartment, be expensive in miami)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(apartment, be in boston)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(apartment, be expensive in miami)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(apartment, be in nyc)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be in nyc)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(apartment, is nyc)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(apartment, be in nyc)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(apartment, be in nyc)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(apartment, is nyc)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(apartment, is nyc)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(apartment, is nyc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be in new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(apartment, be in new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hotel room, be in boston)