aphid: is harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.58
, habitat
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, garden
Weight: 0.49
Siblings beetle
Weight: 0.38
, gypsy moth
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.37
, moth
Weight: 0.37
, termite
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harmful 1.00
be harmful to plants 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(dung beetle, is harmful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(beetle, is harmful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(beetle, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(beetle, is harmful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(dung beetle, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(dung beetle, is harmful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(aphid, is harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(aphid, be harmful to plants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(aphid, be harmful to plants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(aphid, be harmful to plants)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(aphid, be harmful to plants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(aphid, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beetle, is harmful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dung beetle, is harmful)