apparatus: has quality worth

Related concepts

Parents	machine Weight: 0.65 , electronic device Weight: 0.63 , configuration Weight: 0.58 , structure Weight: 0.58
Siblings	vacuum tube Weight: 0.62 , elevator Weight: 0.61 , test tube Weight: 0.61 , boiler Weight: 0.60 , condenser Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality worth	1.00
has quality good	0.85
has quality better	0.83
has quality bad	0.82
is value	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(machine, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(apparatus, has quality worth)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(apparatus, has quality worth)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(apparatus, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(machine, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(machine, has quality good)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(vacuum tube, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(machine, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(apparatus, has quality worth)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(apparatus, has quality worth)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(apparatus, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(vacuum tube, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(vacuum tube, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(apparatus, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(apparatus, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(machine, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(vacuum tube, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(apparatus, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(machine, has quality good)